|
The SIL
Approach to Saving Money
1. Introduction
Most companies in the process industry perform Process Hazard
Analyses (PHA) upon their assets. In some jurisdictions, PHA is
mandatory, but even where it is not, companies have started to realize
economic benefits from performing PHA. The most common PHA process is
the Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOP) and this is being increasingly
combined with Safety Integrity Levels (SIL). SIL as defined in IEC
61508, may be easily performed from HAZOP results combined with a risk
graph. It is possible to use a SIL optimization process to suggest ways
of improving protection against hazards that could have large economic
penalties in plant operation.
2. Safety
Integrity Levels
The term Safety Integrity Level comes from the International
Electrotechnical Commission’s standard IEC 61508 “Functional Safety of
Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems
(E/E/PE)”. Although SILs were first formulated with these systems in
mind, the basic principles behind SILs can be applied to any system. IEC
61508 was intended for use by the manufacturers of E/E/PE systems. A
second standard IEC 61511 was intended for the users.
3. Some Common Problems and the SIL Approach
3.1. Premature PSV Opening
Situations can arise where a high level or high pressure in a storage
tank, which may not be dangerous itself, will trigger a premature
opening of a PSV and a subsequent loss. SIL analysis of HAZOP deviations
that lead to high levels or high pressure have shown that automating of
specific block valves will reduce the frequency of premature PSV opening
to a more tolerable level, at a relatively modest cost.
3.2. Defining/Reducing Test Frequencies for ESDVs
Test frequencies for ESDVs, and other safety related equipment, are
often mandated or are defined with only previous practice as a guide.
This means that testing can be disruptive, expensive and it sometimes
wears out the equipment, before it is ever needed in reality.
The methods used to validate SILs, in practice, provide an opportunity
to obtain evidence that less frequent testing will suffice to maintain
the required SIL. Often, the test frequency, or test interval, is the
most dominant factor in the calculation of the probability of failure on
demand (PFD). Therefore, it is relatively easy to change the test
interval and determine what is the lowest test frequency that will still
satisfy the required SIL. In this way, a case can be made for easement
of mandatory test frequencies, or to change established practice.
4. Conclusions
Using the SIL approach to follow up the results of a HAZOP or other PHA
can help to reduce losses and operating costs at a modest expenditure of
effort and money.
Training Workshop on Safety Integrity Level (SIL) - IEC 61508/61511
The International Electro-technical Commission (IEC) has
developed guidelines as per Standards IEC: 61508/61511 on Safety
Integrity Level (SIL). The standards deal with the Integrity/functional
Safety of Instrumented Systems and present a systematic approach to Life
Cycle Safety and Safety Management. It means that Safety Instrumented
Systems (SIS) like Emergency Shutdown Systems (ESD) complete with
sensors and final elements need to be designed and maintained to
guarantee a certain Safety Level of the operation. The SIL represents
the probability of failure on demand.
The IEC 61508 standard will increasingly act as a Global Industrial best
practice Standard for Safety Management with a special focus on Safety
Instrumented Systems. Derived from it is sector specific Standard IEC
61511 for the process Industry. The Regulators (OSHA in the case of PSM)
expect that facilities will follow the relevant good engineering
practices (GEP) or have an equivalent process in place that achieves the
same level of safety. The Standard will guide Regulators/Insurers to
evaluate Safety in a company. The Standard will enable to demonstrate
that the Method is followed as an internationally accepted best practice
for safety. This will even be more important in the cases of accidents
and liability claims.
KLG Environment & Safety Sciences Ltd, a subsidiary of KLG Systel Ltd is
conducting a two days workshop on SIL classification and verification at
New Delhi and Mumbai which is the first of its kind being conducted in
India. The core faculty for the workshop will include speakers from TNO
Safety Solutions Consultants BV (TNO SSC)The Netherlands at doorstep,
who are pioneers in advising implementation of, and compliance with the
IEC 61508/61511 Standards and have run similar workshops in several
European and Asian countries. The workshop is exclusive of its type and
is designed to have a detailed insight into the understanding and
compliance with the IEC requirements in relation to the “Classification
of Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) and Verification”.
SIL Study helps to fulfill this objective and offers a high reliable
system towards overall plant safety. The concept of SIL is already well
entrenched and adopted in USA, CANADA, EUROPEAN and other developed
countries. Participation in this workshop would be extremely useful for
all management, project and safety personnel with responsibilities for
Safety Management and Safety Instrumented Systems.
We have planned to conduct two SIL Workshops along with faculty from TNO
Safety Solutions Consultants BV, The Netherlands during Nov 2004 as
follows:
| |
Place |
Venue |
Date |
Time |
| a) |
New Delhi |
Hotel Hyatt
Regency |
26 & 27 Nov, 2004 |
9.30 a.m. to 5.00
p.m. |
| b) |
Mumbai |
Hotel Grand Hyatt |
29 & 30 Nov, 2004 |
9.30 a.m. to 5.00
p.m. |
The per participant fees is Rs. 45,000/- (Rupees Forty Five Thousand
Only) inclusive of all taxes, lunches/ refreshment etc. The course
material/ certificate will be provided to all the participants.
Companies/ Organization to forward the names & address of the
participants and place for training along with cheque for participant
fees in favour of “KLG ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY SCIENCES LTD”. In view of
limited availability of seats registration will be done on first come
first served basis for this program. Substitutes would be welcome in
case nominee is unable to attend.
For further feedback if any, contact.
V B Sarin
vbsarin@klgsystel.com
Mobile: 9810487379
CV of Herman Jansen
CV of
ChrisMPietersen
|